Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajemen, Institusi Dan Keluarga Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Dengan Profitabilitas Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI

Main Article Content

Christian Timotius Peilouw
Galuh Budi Astuti


This research is an explanatory research, intending to find the effect of share ownership by management, institutions, and families, on debt policy which use agency theory, with variables of profitability intervening. The study population  is  the  IDX  companies  other  than  banks  and finance, which were registered in the 2015-2016 period. The sampling technique used purposive sampling so as many as 330 companies were obtained. Data analysis technique used is Partial Least Squares (PLS) by testing the hypothesis statistically. The result is there is no effect of management ownership on profitability, there is an influence of management ownership on debt policy, there is an influence of institutional ownership on profitability, there is no effect of institutional ownership on debt policy,  there is no influence of  family ownership on profitability, there is no influence of ownership of  family ownership on debt policy , there is an effect of profitability on debt policy, there is no effect of management ownership on debt policy through profitability, there is an influence of institutional ownership on debt policy through profitability, there is no influence of family ownership on debt policy through profitability.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Timotius Peilouw, C., & Budi Astuti, G. (2018). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajemen, Institusi Dan Keluarga Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Dengan Profitabilitas Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI. Akubis: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 3(02), 46–60.


Abor, J. 2008. Agency Theoritic Determinants of Debt Levels: Evidence from Ghana, Review of Accounting and Finance. Vol. 7, No. 2. h. 183-192.
Artini L.G.S. dan Diantini N.N.A., 2014. Struktur Kepemilikan Saham Terhadap Kebijakan Utang Perusahaan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 18(3). Astuti, D. A., Rahman, D., dan Sudarno. 2015. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Keluarga Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Agency Cost Sebagai Variabel Moderating, Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi. Vol. 7, No. 2. September. h. 98-108.
Bathala C.T., Moon K.P. danRao R.P., 1994. Managerial ownership, debt policy, and the impact of institutional holdings: An agency perspective, Financial Management: pp. 38- 50.
Brigham, E. F., dan Houston, J. F. 2001. Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Erlangga. Christiawan, Y. J. dan Tarigan, J. 2007. Kepemilikan Manajerial: Kebijakan Hutang, Kinerja dan Nilai Perusahaan, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol 9(1), h. 1-8.
Donald R.C & Pamela S.Schindler, 2006, “Bussines Research Methods”, 9th edition. McGrawHill International Edition
Huang, G., dan Song, M. 2006. The Determinant of Capital Structure: Evidence from China. Proceeding at the 14th Association for Chinese Economic Studies (ACES) University of Sydney.
Ishak, I., Haron, M. N., & Salleh, N. Z. 2011. Family Control and Earnings Management: Malaysia Evidence. International Conference on Economics, Business and Management, Vol 22(2), h. 82-86.
James, H. S. 1999. Owner As Manager, Extend Horizons And The Family Line, International Journal Of The Economics Of Business. Vol. 6, No. 1. h. 305-360. Jensen M.C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, The American economic review, 76(2): pp. 323-329.
Jensen M.C. dan Meckling W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of financial economics, 3(4): pp. 305-360.
Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., dan Zom, T. S. 1992. Simultaneous Determinant of Insider Ownership, Debt, And Dividend Policies, Journal of Financial And Quantitave Analysis. Vol. 27, No. 2. h. 247-263.
Jogiyanto H.M., dan Willy Abdillah. 2009. Konsep & Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk Penelitian Empiris. Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta; BPFE.
Joher H. dan Ali M., 2006. The impact of ownership structure on corporate debt policy: two stage least square simultaneous model approach for post crisis period: evidence from Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, International business and economics research Journal, 5(5): p. 51.
La Porta, R., De Silane, F. L., dan Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World, Journal of Finance. Vol. 52. Juli. h. 1113-1155. Lee, J. 2006. Family Business Review. Journal of Sage, h.103-114. Lukviarman N. 2004, Ownership structure and firm performance: the case of Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan, Curtin University.
Margaretha, F., dan Asmariani, A. 2009. Faktor-Faktor Agency Theory yang Mempengaruhi Hutang, Media Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen. Vol. 9, No. 1. Jakarta. h. 1-20.
Masdupi, E. 2005. Analisis Dampak Struktur Kepemilikan pada Kebijakan Hutang dalam Mengontrol Konflik Keagenan, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia. Vol. 20, No. 1, Januari. h. 57-69.
Moh’d, M. A., Perry, G. L., dan Rimbey, J. N. 1998. The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: a Time Series Cross Sectional Analysis, Financial Review. Vol. 33. h. 85-99.
Murni S. danAndriana A., 2012. Pengaruh Insider Ownership, Institutional Investor, Dividend Payments, dan Firm Growth terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta), Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 7(1).
Myers, S. C., dan Majluf, N. S. 1984. Corporate Financing And Investment Decision When Firms Have Information Investor Do Not Have, Journal Of Financial Economics. Vol. 13, No. 2. h. 187-221.
Nurbaiti. 2006. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan terhadap Struktur Modal: Analisis Time Series Cross Sectional. TEMA. Vol. 7, No. 2.
Permanasari, W.I. 2010. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajemen, Kepemilikan Perusahaan. Universitas Diponegoro. Peilouw, C.T., 2017. Pengaruh Struktur kepemilikan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan. Vol. 3, No. 1.
Sabrina, A.I. 2010. Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Setyawati, P. A. 2014. Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Dividen, Struktur Aset dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. http :// April 2016.
Villalonga, B., dan Amit, R. 2006. How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 80. h. 385-417.
Wiranata, Y. A., dan Nugrahanti, Y. W. 2013. Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia, Journal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol. 15, No. 1, Mei. h. 15-26.
Yeniatie dan Destriana N., 2010. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan hutang pada perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 12(1): pp. 1-16.